the evolving marriage landscape

http://nyti.ms/1f00hLA

Couples can be happier now than ever before. But it’s rare.

the new yorker on the diminishing value of a brand.

In this article the New Yorker makes a weak case that the value/importance of a company's brand has weakened in the modern day. It's not true. A brand is just as powerful, if not more powerful than it has ever been - there's just more parts of a brand that can be evaluated.

Old school thinking still evaluates a brand's worth based on it's mass/above the line communications.  A brand is, and always has been, the sum of all parts of a company - its products, philosophy, employees, identity etc. A brand is always on and always communicating. Companies that (and have always) embrace that see the 'proliferation of data' as a positive, not a threat to the brand.
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2014/02/17/140217ta_talk_surowiecki

untapped: fans paying tribute

love this fun idea about fans creating content or fun tributes. reminds me of when beck and radiohead opened up their albums.
http://www.fastcocreate.com/3026202/this-tumblr-imagines-further-conversation-stoppers-for-the-stars-of-hbos-true-detective

twitter's future.

http://www.fastcompany.com/3026062/why-twitter-loves-tv

the power of experience.

this presentation from liquid feels a little obvious and maybe even out dated, but there are some good case studies on brands that have put their values into action. however, it still surprises me that marketing professionals point to the 'old model' where brands had all the power and could 'tell you what to think.' good brands, people, etc. have always put their values first and used their values to guide every decision.

http://www.liquidagency.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/LA_Retail_Experience.pdf

defining what you do first.

a good article on defining what your business really does before doing anything else. it's a simple notion, but it is often taken for granted.

http://blogs.hbr.org/2014/02/the-first-strategic-question-every-business-must-ask/?utm_source=Socialflow&utm_medium=Tweet&utm_campaign=Socialflow

on participation. and considerations when asking for it.

a great post on what we need to consider when we're building platforms that require participation with a brand.
http://planninginhighheels.com/2011/02/08/planning-for-participation/

greatest good.

an interesting platform idea that connects people and their skills with people who need their help. the best part? it's all in the name of charity.
http://greatestgood.org/

low retention with SB ads. unless you're the best.

while this article doesn't explicitly state it, there's evidence here on the importance of PR and the need to surround your broadcast with multichannel efforts to actually break through the clutter.
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-03/hey-super-bowl-sponsors-your-ads-are-already-forgotten

great rules to live by. be a better boss.

when i worked on smaller teams, this happened naturally. i realized, to my chagrin it doesn't scale on its own. it requires cultivation and massive amounts of effort.
http://www.fastcompany.com/3025954/leadership-now/6-painless-ways-become-a-better-boss?partner=rss

super bowl social stats.

90% of Super Bowl Social Buzz Came From Mobile (iPhone Ruled)
Read more at http://www.adrants.com/2014/02/90-of-super-bowl-social-buzz-came-from.php#kxlczQxGdK8Uy67X.99

planners to watch in '14.

just an interesting list of planners and the companies they're at.
http://www.slideshare.net/juliancole/50-planners-to-watch-in-2014-30774777

netflix and the future of TV: New Yorker 2.3

a few good quotes and insights on how people are using media and watching content:

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2014/02/03/140203fa_fact_auletta
http://variety.com/2014/tv/news/netflix-now-pulls-in-almost-as-much-revenue-as-hbo-but-hbo-is-far-more-profitable-1201087683/